← Back
01/31/1999 • 6 views

Seattle Times columnist Eugene Robinson arrested on solicitation charge night before Super Bowl

Exterior of a Miami municipal building at night in 1999, police lights reflecting on wet pavement; no identifiable faces.

On January 31, 1999, syndicated columnist Eugene Robinson was arrested in Miami on a charge of soliciting a prostitute the night before Super Bowl XXXIII; the incident prompted public scrutiny and discussion about personal conduct and professional consequences.


On January 31, 1999, syndicated columnist Eugene Robinson was arrested in Miami on a misdemeanor charge of soliciting a prostitute. The arrest occurred the night before Super Bowl XXXIII, which drew heightened attention because Robinson had been attending Super Bowl–related events and because the timing intersected with his public role as a prominent journalist and commentator.

Robinson, then a columnist for The Seattle Times and a nationally syndicated writer, was charged after a police sting operation. Local reporting at the time described an undercover operation in which officers arrested multiple individuals on solicitation-related charges. The Miami arrest record and contemporaneous news accounts identified Robinson among those taken into custody. He later publicly acknowledged the arrest and addressed it with his employer and readers.

The incident prompted immediate coverage in both local and national media. Responses focused on the juxtaposition of Robinson’s professional work—known for commentary on politics, social issues, and public life—and the personal conduct alleged in the charge. Newspapers and broadcasters reported on the legal outcome, the internal handling by The Seattle Times, and the broader questions about how news organizations and the public should treat journalists who face legal or moral controversies.

Legally, solicitation in Miami–Dade County at the time was treated as a misdemeanor. Outcomes for such charges often included fines, diversion programs, or dismissal depending on circumstances and any prior record. Public records and reporting from the period indicate the charge was part of that local legal framework; some accounts noted the charge did not become a long-term criminal precedent in Robinson’s record but did have reputational consequences.

Professionally, The Seattle Times and other outlets covered Robinson’s response. He acknowledged the arrest to readers and to his employer; editorial decisions and reader reactions followed typical patterns for news organizations confronting personnel controversies. Over time, Robinson continued his journalism career, later joining The Washington Post, where he became a Pulitzer Prize–winning columnist. His subsequent career trajectory is part of the record and has been discussed in analyses of how news organizations handle personal misconduct by journalists.

The episode raised recurring questions about privacy, accountability, and the standard to which public figures—especially those who comment on ethics and public policy—are held. Commentators and media ethicists at the time debated whether the arrest should affect Robinson’s credibility or employment, and how newsroom standards should apply.

Historical accounts of the arrest are based on contemporaneous news reports, public records, and Robinson’s own statements. Some details—such as exact legal disposition in court filings or private discussions between Robinson and his employers—are less fully documented in public reporting. Where records are available, they indicate the arrest occurred as reported and led to public scrutiny, while later developments in Robinson’s career demonstrate he continued to work as a prominent journalist.

This summary draws on multiple contemporaneous news reports and public records from early 1999. If you need precise court documents, specific newsroom memos, or verbatim statements from Robinson or The Seattle Times from that period, those can be located in archival news databases and court record repositories.

Share this

Email Share on X Facebook Reddit

Did this surprise you?