01/18/2015 • 6 views
The 2015 'Deflategate' Game: Patriots vs. Colts and the Beginnings of a Controversy
On January 18, 2015, the New England Patriots defeated the Indianapolis Colts in the AFC Championship amid allegations that some Patriots footballs were underinflated — a dispute that led to an extended NFL investigation and legal battles.
Those initial comments prompted the National Football League to investigate whether footballs used by the Patriots were under the league-mandated inflation level. The NFL's rules require footballs to be inflated between 12.5 and 13.5 pounds per square inch (psi). The Colts turned possession of the game balls over to NFL officials for inspection that evening. Subsequent reporting and statements from involved parties indicated measurements below the required minimum on a number of Patriots game balls.
The NFL commissioned an independent review led by attorney Theodore Wells Jr., known as the Wells Report, which examined interviews, physical evidence and scientific analyses. The Wells Report concluded that it was “more probable than not” that Patriots personnel had deliberately deflated footballs and that quarterback Tom Brady was likely “generally aware” of the actions. The report relied on a combination of ball pressure measurements, timing of measurements, and witness statements.
The NFL Discipline Officer later issued a four-game suspension for Brady, fined the Patriots $1 million, and docked the team two draft picks (a first-round pick in 2016 and a fourth-round pick in 2017). The Patriots and Brady contested the findings and punishment. Brady appealed the suspension, and legal proceedings followed. In September 2015, a federal judge vacated Brady's suspension, finding flaws in the NFL's investigative process and in the Wells Report’s conclusions. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals subsequently reinstated the suspension in April 2016, and Brady served the four-game suspension to start the 2016 season after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case.
Throughout the public debate, scientists and statisticians criticized and defended aspects of the Wells Report's use of the Ideal Gas Law and the handling of evidence, and independent experts published differing analyses about whether environmental conditions could account for the measured pressure differences. The physical evidence and interpretations remained contested: some analyses suggested that temperature and measurement timing could explain lower readings, while other findings and witness statements supported the Wells Report's conclusion of intentional tampering.
The episode had broader consequences for league policy and public perception. It intensified scrutiny of equipment procedures, ball-handling protocols, and the NFL's investigative methods. It also fed into ongoing media and fan narratives about Tom Brady and the Patriots' organizational culture. Because legal rulings ultimately both vacated and then reinstated discipline, and because scientific analyses produced divergent views, Deflategate remains a debated chapter in NFL history rather than a matter of unanimous factual consensus.
In short, the January 18, 2015 AFC Championship produced a decisive Patriots victory and launched an investigation whose findings, legal outcomes, and scientific interpretations generated prolonged controversy and debate within professional football.