← Back
03/09/1998 • 5 views

Match Stopped as Traditional Healer Is Ejected for Attempting Ritual on Opposing Players

A crowded soccer stadium from the late 1990s with stewards escorting a person off the pitch while players and officials watch; spectators in stands reacting.

A professional soccer match on 9 March 1998 was halted after a visiting team's staff member, described by witnesses as a traditional healer or 'witch doctor', entered the pitch area and attempted a ritual directed at opponents; officials removed the individual and play was suspended amid protests and confusion.


On 9 March 1998, a competitive soccer fixture was interrupted when a person associated with one of the teams performed ritual actions on or near the field that opposing players and match officials interpreted as an attempt to curse or influence the opposition. Reports from contemporary news coverage describe the individual as a traditional healer — sometimes called a 'witch doctor' in media accounts — who approached the playing area carrying objects used in ritual practice. Stadium stewards and refereeing officials intervened, removing the person from the vicinity and temporarily halting play while stadium security and team officials conferred.

Contemporary coverage and later summaries indicate the incident provoked immediate reaction from players and supporters. Some players reportedly refused to continue until the individual was expelled; others appeared unsettled by the ritual gestures and accompanying noise or paraphernalia. Match officials faced a practical decision: restore order and resume play, or abandon the match if teams would not proceed. According to available reports, the game was suspended briefly before resuming once the individual had been removed and stadium staff assured officials that no further pitch incursions would occur.

Context matters when interpreting how this event was reported. Terms such as 'witch doctor' reflect journalistic conventions of the period but carry cultural and pejorative connotations. The person involved was described in different sources as a traditional healer or spiritual practitioner; precise details about their formal role with the team, their credentials, or the specific religious or cultural traditions they represented were not consistently reported. Likewise, accounts differ on whether club officials formally employed the individual, whether they had previously been present at matches in an official capacity, or whether this was an unsanctioned intrusion.

The incident highlights tensions that sometimes arise at sporting events where cultural practices intersect with modern professional sport. In some regions, teams employ or consult traditional healers or spiritual advisors as part of broader preparations; in other cases, independent supporters or contractors bring rituals to stadiums. Match regulations and security protocols typically prohibit unauthorized entry onto the field, and referees are empowered to suspend or abandon play if safety or order cannot be guaranteed.

Eyewitness and press reports from the time focused on the spectacle and the immediate disruption rather than on longer-term consequences. There is no consistent public record indicating that the individual faced criminal charges arising from the incident, nor that the match's final outcome was overturned because of the interruption. As with many sensational sporting episodes, follow-up reporting emphasized reactions and local color rather than detailed legal or disciplinary proceedings.

Because primary-source material is limited and accounts vary, some aspects of this episode remain uncertain: the individual's exact relationship to the team, the ritual's specific elements or intended spiritual meaning, and any internal club responses beyond immediate removal from the pitch. What is clear from contemporary reports is that on 9 March 1998 a ritual intervention on the sidelines disrupted play, stadium officials removed the practitioner, and the match was briefly halted amid protests and confusion before resuming.

This summary is based on contemporaneous news reporting and later summaries; where sources disagree on details such as labels and motivations, those uncertainties are noted rather than resolved beyond the available evidence.

Share this

Email Share on X Facebook Reddit

Did this surprise you?